Showing posts with label PCAOB. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PCAOB. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

Van Krikorian and Global Gold Corp (otcqb: GBGD) Accused of Misappropriating Funds From Investor

It appears that a disgruntled employee of Global Gold Corp. (otcmarkets: GBGD) from Armenia, (which there are many of) decided to expose his former employers and dropped off some files to my attention. In that file was a copy of a "Derivative Action Complaint" which was prepared by Consolidated Resources Armenia (CRA), GBGD's latest victim.

The COMPLAINT outlines that Mr. Van Krikorian, the President, Director and Corporate Counsel  of GBGD, and Mr. Ian Hague, independent director and controlling shareholder of GBGD (and founder of FireBird Management) conspired to defraud its investor, CRA, of $5MM capital investment and $2MM Note and retain the benefit of the capital infusion for GBGD.

Evidence of this complaint supports what I discovered in the past, that GBGD (aka "GGC") was trying to defraud CRA out of their $7MM investment made on the Toukhmanuk and Getik gold properties in Armenia. CRA owns 49% of the Joint Venture known as  Global Gold Consolidated Resources (GGCRL), and GBGD ("GGC") owns 51%.

Mr. Ian Hague and Mr. Van Krikorian abused their powers as directors of GGCRL and GBGD in order to commit the worst kind of fraud – specifically blocking receipt by GGCRL and depriving CRA investors of all of its Armenia mining assets while seeking to extort millions of dollars in cash and equity illicitly from CRA in exchange for allowing the obligatory asset transfer to occur.

This COMPLAINT was prepared on behalf of CRA by DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP, which is one of America's top 100 LAW FIRMS.

A full copy of the complaint is posted below:




Some of the more egregious items outlined in the COMPLAINT accuse Mr. Ian Hague and Mr. Van Krikorian of the following:
"Krikorian and Hague have refused without justification to bring about the transfer of key assets to GGCRL, assets essential for it to conduct its business and deliver shareholder value. Krikorian and Hague have failed to assist in the transfer of these assets, as a means to coerce egregious employment terms for Krikorian and to alter the terms of the joint venture for the benefit of GGC and themselves personally, at the expense of the other joint venture partner, CRA. Krikorian and Hague have perpetuated a series of improper actions undermining GGCRL’s business, including: 
(i) concealment and misrepresentation of substantial GGC liabilities, including tax liabilities that posed material risks to the assets to be transferred to GGCRL;  
(ii) fraudulent transfers of corporate funds to personal bank accounts of GGC officers; 
(iii) misappropriation and misuse of corporate funds, and 
(iv) self-dealing. (2)"
"Rather than take steps as directors of GGCRL to ensure that the Closing took place, Krikorian and Hague have caused GGC to block the Closing and have attempted to extract more value for GGC and themselves, at the expense of CRA and GGCRL. (62)"   
"Krikorian even expressly indicated at a GGCRL board meeting that he and Hague intend to persist in blocking the Closing until they “get what they want”—simply ignoring their duties as directors of GGCRL. (64)" 
"Throughout these delays, Krikorian has repeatedly sought to negotiate an employment agreement with GGCRL for himself, with terms egregiously favorable to him personally. In particular, as a portion of his executive compensation to be paid by GGCRL, Krikorian has demanded that he personally receive a minimum of 5% of the shares of GGCRL in addition to significant salary increases, annual bonuses, and a golden parachute providing for a huge windfall payment of accelerated compensation equating to millions of dollars (66)"  
"and with Hague’s full knowledge and unconditional support, Krikorian has blocked completion of the Closing and both prevented and severely damaged the Public Listing process in part as a ploy to attempt to force GGCRL to agree to Krikorian’s egregious terms of employment. (67)" 
"Throughout the delays, acting in their capacities as directors of both GGC and GGCRL, Krikorian and Hague have attempted to force a wholesale alteration of the material terms of the Joint Venture Agreement, to secure terms more favorable to GGC, at the expense of CRA. (68)" 
"Holding out for egregious and damaging employment terms and a wholly reshaped joint venture deal, Krikorian and Hague also refused to go forward with negotiations on two reverse merger opportunities, which would have brought significant value to GGCRL and its shareholders. (69)"
"Krikorian and Hague systematically delayed the Closing at every step laid out in the Joint Venture Agreement. Krikorian made it an overt strategy to abuse his role and signing authority as interim executive chairman, using the routine signing of GGCRL corporate documents necessary for developing its business as bargaining chips to exact special favors for GGC and Hague and himself.( 72)"
"Krikorian and Hague have stated that, by preventing the Closing of the joint venture, they intend to retain the benefit of the capital infusion GGC received from CRA—which made it possible for GGC to stay in business—(76) "
"As a part of their ongoing effort to avoid tax liabilities to the Armenian
government, upon information and belief Krikorian and Hague have supported and encouraged fraudulent transfers of GGCRL funds.
In particular, Krikorian and Hague have knowingly transferred corporate funds to personal bank accounts—including without limitation accounts in the name of the Country Manager, Ashot Boghossian—in order to evade Armenian tax authorities. (81)" 
"Krikorian and Hague misappropriated and misused substantial corporate funds, repeatedly using funds advanced by CRA for purposes other than those disclosed. For example, a substantial portion of the $5 million advanced by CRA, as well as the $2 million of addition interim funding, was intended to be used for plant expansion and balance sheet cleanup. Instead, Krikorian and Hague directed GGC to use a substantial portion of those $5 million of funds for other unapproved purposes, and diverted substantial portions of those funds to GGC obligations, to the detriment of GGCRL and its shareholders, all while blocking the intended plant expansion and balance sheet cleanup. In other words, Krikorian and Hague have authorized GGC to use those funds for unapproved purposes instead of forcing GGC to use those funds as otherwise agreed, or have themselves blocked GGCRL from using those funds for high-priority purposes. (85)"

http://www.briefingwire.com/pr/global-gold-corp-otcqb-gbgd-manager-and-director-accused-of-misappropriating-funds-from-investor


About this Blog:  Between 2009 and 2012 I was an active investor in the mineral exploration sector in the Republic of Armenia.  Our main project in Armenia was the MARJAN polymetallic gold and silver project located in near Sissian.  My JV partner, Mr. Van Z. Krikorian, President of Global Gold Corp (otcqb: GBGD) and Trustee of the Armenian Assembly of America, used corrupt means including using his influence with the US EMBASY in YEREVAN to secure an indictment against me for theft of the JV and to corrupt the Armenia judicial system to give him a favourable ruling.

Mr. Van Z. Krikorian is the President, CEO and Legal Counsel of Global Gold Corp. (otcqb:GBGD), a penny stock listed on the OTC  markets. His public filings with the US Scurities and Exchange Commission  fail to fully disclose the reality on the ground in Armenia in the promotion and development of GBGD's gold project, the TOUKHMANUK GOLD MINE.

This blog is an effort to bring transparency of the activities of Global God Corp. (otcqb: GBGD) and Mr. Van Z. Krikorian in Armenia.

Sunday, June 16, 2013

Global Gold's Application for A New Tailings Dam REJECTED by Ministry of Nature Protection of the Republic of Armenia


Global Gold Corp. (GBGD) faces additional struggles in Armenia in its ongoing effort to restart its flag ship TOUKHMANUK Gold Mine, operated by its subsidiary, MEGO-GOLD LLC.

Beyond having no money to operate, GBGD has not even secured a permit to build a new tailings dam.

On April 26, 2013. the Ministry of Energy and Nature Protection (MNP) of the Republic of Armenia REJECTED Mego-Gold's application for a tailings dam for the TOUKHMANUK GOLD MINE.

A copy of the original Decision in the Armenian language, signed by the Minister of the MNP, Mr. Aram Harutyunyan, is  posed below:

About this Blog:  Between 2009 and 2012 I was an active investor in the mineral exploration sector in the Republic of Armenia.  Our main project in Armenia was the MARJAN polymetallic gold and silver project located in near Sissian.  My JV partner, Mr. Van Z. Krikorian, President of Global Gold Corp (otcqb: GBGD) and Trustee of the Armenian Assembly of America, used corrupt means including using his influence with the US EMBASSY in YEREVAN to secure an indictment against me for theft of the JV and to corrupt the Armenia judicial system to give him a favourable ruling.

Mr. Van Z. Krikorian is the President, CEO and Legal Counsel of Global Gold Corp. (otcqb:GBGD), a penny stock listed on the OTC  markets. His public filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission  fail to fully disclose the reality on the ground in Armenia in the promotion and development of GBGD's gold project, the TOUKHMANUK GOLD MINE.

This blog is an effort to bring transparency of the activities of Global God Corp. (otcqb: GBGD) and Mr. Van Z. Krikorian in Armenia.






For your information I have made an unofficial translation of the conclusion of the decision which states:

Basis of the expert conclusion
‐ Missing in the work plan are the community’s decision and approval of the work plan in their region and the community’s decision on allocating the land as per sub-articles E and Z of article 6 as per RA law regarding “the expert analysis on the effect on the environment”.

‐ The Company should have also presented their mining plan as well as the factory’s renovation plan.

‐ Missing is the tailings dam’s security certificate as required by RA law.

‐ Landslide bodies are present in the tailings dam’s location as per the studies conducted by the Japanese company.

‐ Missing in the plan is also the replacement of the clay layer by a polyethylene membrane as required by RA law.

Conclusion:

Taking into account the above-mentioned results, we reject «Mego Gold» LLC’s working plan for the building of a new tailings dam at the Toukhmanuk factory.


Vice-director: H. Grigoryan

Expert: L. Balayan

Signed

stamped
Again, this Decision was issued April 26, 2013 and GBGD has been keeping it a big secret and has not filed any timely disclosure reports on this matter.

Under US Securities and Exchange Commission rules, GBGD must timely disclose all material events under form 8-K. Also all material information must be included in their quarterly financial reports.
"Form 8-K

In addition to filing annual reports on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, public companies must report certain material corporate events on a more current basis. Form 8-K is the “current report” companies must file with the SEC to announce major events that shareholders should know about"....."Companies have four business days to file a Form 8-K"...
http://www.sec.gov/answers/form8k.htm
The rules require that public companies issue material disclosure reports within 4 business days of such events.  GBGD should have filed an 8-K report no later than Friday May 3, 2013. Mr. Van Z. Krikorian has breached these regulation. You would think investors should know that the tailings dam application was rejected, and rejected for some very serious reasons too.

To make maters worse for GBGD, they had a chance to disclose this matter in their 10-Q filing for the period ending March 31, 2013, which was filed on May 20, 2013.

All that GBGD reported in their 10-Q, filed on May 20, 2013 was:
The Company's expected plan of operation for the calendar year 2013 is:

(a) To implement the joint venture agreement with Consolidated Resources USA, LLC, and build a new tailings dam necessary to recommence operating expanded mining operations at Toukhmanuk, to generate income from offering services from the ISO certified lab operating at Toukhmanuk, and to continue to explore this property to confirm and develop historical reserve reports, to explore and develop the Getik property in Armenia;
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/319671/000143774913006451/ggc_10q-033113.htm
Clearly Global Gold has failed to timely file an 8-K on material event. The inability of GBGD to secure a permit for a tailings dam is a material event that further delays the financing and commencement of mining of the Toukhmanuk Gold Mine and ultimately affects the valuation of the Company.
GBGD has been misleading investors on issues related to the tailings dam at the TOUKHMANUK GOLD MINE for some time now. GBGD claims in its 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2012, filed on April 16, 2013, that:
As of December 31, 2012, the Company has spent approximately $11,130,000 on mining and exploration activities at this property, excluding acquisition and capital costs. In 2012, the Company installed two new mills at the plant to increase capacity and efficiency, but did not process any ore pending approval and construction of a new tailings dam and resolution of joint venture issues.  http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/319671/000143774913004481/gbgd_10k-123112.htm

Furthermore, Global Gold has been talking about building a new tailings dam at the TOUKHMAUK GOLD MINE since 2008. In its 10-K/A report for the period ending December 31, 2008, GBGD states:
The Company has maintained the plant’s crushers, mills, and gravitation circuits are in good condition while also adding a hydro cyclone, flotation cells, and building a new tailings dam.  http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/319671/000143774910000448/globalgold_10ka-123108.htm
GBGD needed to build this new tailings dam since 2008. Due to apparent mismanagement at the company, it still has not been done.   
Clearly the lack of disclosure is designed to mislead investors that there is no issue with the tailings dam, considering the Management is aware there are serious issues in securing the tailings dam permit, including its inability since 2008 to secure a proper "Land Use Agreement" and get local community support for the new tailings dam.

This is just a continuation of a pattern of misleading and false statements that Global Gold management, orchestrated by Mr. Van Krikorian, Mr. Ashot Poghossyan and Mr. Jan Dulman to hide what really is going on in Armenia, in apparent effort to attempt to conceal the value, or lack thereof,  of the TOUKHMANUK gold mine and ultimately the share price of GBGD. Hiding this information was useful to swindle CRA into investing $5MM in Mego-Gold. Money advanced by CRA included $260,000 in tailings dam design and construction, as outlined in the budge below. That money was advanced by CRA in 2011 to Global Gold but this money was misappropriated  because as  of today,that tailings dam has not been built.

Also the GBGD has failed to fully disclose that it has lost its exploration license to the Toukmanuk area. See my blog: http://gbgd-armenia-mining.blogspot.ca/2013/05/to-gbgd-liar-liar-pants-on-fire.html

Inline image 1


The pattern of deceit actually starts in 2008 when GBGD falsely stated that the Company is required to mine 80,000 tones per year of ore to keep the Toukhmanuk license in good standing. The truth finally was disclosed by GBGD in its 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2012 as filed on April 16, 2013.

The 10-K now states
"The Company is required to pay annual governmental fees of approximately $32,000. The Company is also required to spend annually approximately $1,200,000 on exploration work and mining annually 168,500 tonnes of mineralized rock at the property as submitted and approved in its mining plan in order to maintain the licenses in good standing"
This is a big jump from 80,000 tpy to 168,500 tpy and a big mistatement.

There are other examples of this in GBGD's SEC statements, including the recent discovery that GBGD has been keeping two separate books of mining at Toukhmanuk, over reporting production by 104% since 2006. See my blog: http://gbgd-armenia-mining.blogspot.ca/2013/05/global-gold-corp-gbgd-overstates-mining.html

The actions of Mr. Van Krikorian and GBGD or lack thereof should be investigated by SEC Enforcement and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Global Gold Corp. (GBGD) Overstates Mining Volumes At Its Toukhmanuk Gold Mine by 104%


ARMENIAN BELOW

I recently received copies of a letter including a summary of production reports filed by MEGO-GOLD LLC, a Global Gold subsidiary for production at the TOUKHMANUK GOLD MINE in Armenia.

The letter was issued by the Chief of Staff of the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources, Mr. Karen Kagramanyan, (MENR) following an access to information request by Mr. Arthur Grigoryan, the President of "ECOLOGICAL RIGHT", an Armenian Environmental NGO.





I have compiled the data and have compared it with the mining volumes published by GBGD in its December 31, 2012 annual 10-K report. The report is signed by Mr. Van Z. Krikorian as CEO and the rest of the Board of Directors and audited by RBSM LLP of New York.

Since 2006, GLOBAL GOLD CORP (otcqb: GBGD) has overstated its mining volume by 104% from its Toukhmanuk Gold Mine located in Armenia.

In the 10-K report, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), for the year ending December 31, 2012, Mr. Krikorian and his board certified the following statement:
The Company has mined mineralized rock of approximately 52,000 tonnes in 2006 with content of approximately 1.27 g / t gold and 6.37 g / t silver, no mining in 2007, approximately 82,000 tonnes in 2008 with content of approximately 1.85 g / t gold and 5.21 g / t silver, no mining in 2009, approximately 21,000 tonnes in 2010 with content of approximately 2.08 g / t gold and 5.68 g / t silver, approximately 21,400 tonnes in 2011 with content of approximately 0.92 g / t gold and 3.32 g / t silver , and no mining in 2012. 
The production records filed by Global Gold in Armenia paint a different story. Below is the translation of the table received from the MENR. This table is drawn from the official reports of production at the TOUKHMANUK GOLD MINE filed by MEGO-GOLD, since 2006.





Converting the GBGD data to conform to the Table provided by the MENR we see a different picture emerging.

Converting the Armenian data to conform to the GBGD data published in its 10-K we get the following table:


In 2006, GBGD claimed it mined 52,000 tones of ore when it actually mined 12,100 tones of ore. In 2008, GBGD claimed it mined 82,000 tones of ore when it actually mined 45,660 tones of ore. Meanwhile the GOLD content remains the same, at approximately 66 kg, even-though the volumes differ dramatically. This implies the grade of the ore for 2006, as filed with the MENR, graded for Gold was approximately 5.45 g / t but the grade for Gold reported by GBGD in its SEC filings was 1.27 g / t. The ore for 2008, as filed with the MENR, graded approximately 3.34 g / t, but GBGD reported in its SEC filings that it was 1.85 g / t.

In 2010, 21,000 Tones of ore mined GBGD claimed it with a grade of 2.08 g Gold / t, equivalent to 43.68 kg of Gold content. The Official Armenian records show 16,800 Tones of ore mined That GBGD with Gold content of 18:31 kg of Gold content, equivalent to 1:17 g / t. Global Gold Gold mined in 2010 overstated by 24.1 kg in its SEC filings.

In 2011, GBGD claimed it mined 21,400 Tones of ore with a grade of 0.92 g Gold / t , equivalent to 19.69kg of Gold content. The Official A rmenian records show That GBGD mined 11.860 Gold Tones of ore with content of 18:31 kg of Gold content, equivalent to 1.54 g / t. Global Gold Gold mined overstated in its SEC filings in 2011 by 1.38 kg.

No investor can now TRUST what the real grade of the TOUKHMANUK Gold Mine is. Global Gold reports one grade with the MENR and a different grade in their audited financial statements filed with the SEC. This is a problem for Huge Global Investors Gold since rely on to evaluate the value of Published Grades Gold Assets. Have Investor's been misled in Global Gold?

Is Global Gold Corp. (GBGD), Mr. Van Z. Krikorian and Mr. Ashot Poghossyan willfully and knowingly conspired to File and misleading statements in their FALSE Audited Financial Statements or 10-K Filed FALSE Actually they have with the Ministry of Energy and Natural Reports Resources of the Republic of Armenia (MENR)? 

There clearly has to be an investigation by the SEC, PCAOB and the MENR to find out what the real truth is. 

About this Blog:  Between 2009 and 2012 I was an active investor in the mineral exploration sector in the Republic of Armenia.  Our main project in Armenia was the MARJAN polymetallic gold and silver project located in near Sissian.  My JV partner, Mr. Van Z. Krikorian, President of Global Gold Corp (otcqb: GBGD) and Trustee of the Armenian Assembly of America, used corrupt means including using his influence with the US EMBASSY in YEREVAN to secure an indictment against me for theft of the JV and to corrupt the Armenia judicial system to give him a favourable ruling.

Mr. Van Z. Krikorian is the President, CEO and Legal Counsel of Global Gold Corp. (otcqb:GBGD), a penny stock listed on the OTC  markets. His public filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission  fail to fully disclose the reality on the ground in Armenia in the promotion and development of GBGD's gold project, the TOUKHMANUK GOLD MINE.

This blog is an effort to bring transparency of the activities of Global God Corp. (otcqb: GBGD) and Mr. Van Z. Krikorian in Armenia.

ARMENIAN TRANSLATION

->
Global Gold will vorporatsian (GBGD) its s gold mine increased ing the mining capacity of 104 percent.

V. yerjers I got the Enerdetikayi and Natural Resources նախարարության նամակ _պատասխանի պատճեններ ը, ներառյալ Հայաստանի Թուխմանուկ ոսկու հանքավայրի արտադրական հաշվետվությունների ամփոփագի ը ՝ լրացրած Գլոբալ Գոլդ կազմակերպության դուստր ձեռնարկության ՄԵԳՈ ԳՈԼԴ ՍՊԸ - ի կողմից :

Նամակը հրապարակված է ր ՀՀ էներգետիկայի և բնական պաշարների ( ՀՀ ԷԲՊ ) նախարարության  աշխատակազմի ղեկավար պրն . Կարեն Ղաղրամանյանի կողմից , որպես տեղեկատվության մատչելիության պատասխան նամակ Հայաստանյան “ Էկոիրավունք ”   ՀԿ նախագահ պրն . Արթուր Grigoryan hartsmone. 

  2012 annual 10- K report ). Van Z. Krikorian said the report was signed by the CEO and   board of directors, which the audit was conducted in New YOUR updated in RBSM LLP- by:

2006 թ _ց . իվեր Գլոբալ Գոլդ կ որպորացիան ( այժմ` GBGD) ոսկու արդյունաբերության Թուխմանուկ մասնաճյուղում ուռճացրել է հանքարդյունաբերության ծավալը 104 տոկոսով :

10 - Կ հաշվետվությունում ինչպես , որ Միացյալ Նահանգների արժեթղթերի և բորսաների հանձնաժողովում պաշտոնապես լրացված է  2012 թ վերջին ( Դեկտեմբեր 31) պ րն Կրկորյանը և իր խորհուրդը ներկայացրել են հետևյալ պաշտոնական հաղորդագրությունը՝

 Ընկերությունն 2006 թ հանքայնացրել է  մոտավորապես 52,000 տ . հանքաքար  մոտավորապես 1.27 գ / տ ոսկի և 6.37 գ / տ արծաթ բաղադրությամբ ,
In 2007 , the mining industry has not been implemented . 
2008 թ մոտավորապես 82,000 տոննա հանքաքար, մոտավորապես 1.85 գ / տ ոսկի և 5.21 գ / տ արծաթ գո յ ացող բաղադրությամբ , 
2009 mining has been carried out ;
2010 was approximately 21,000 tonnes of ore, approximately . 2.08 g / t gold and 5.68 g / t silver Guo Yu being formulated ,  
2011 year . Approximately 21; 400 տոննա հանքաքար, մոտավորապես 0.92 գ / տ ոսկի և 3.32 գ / տ արծաթ գոհացող բաղադրությամբ ,
In 2012 , the mining industry has not implemented

Արտադրական ծավալների այլ կերպ են արձանագած Գլոբալ Գոլդ Հայաստան մասնաճյուղում : Ստորև աղյուսակում ներկայացվում է ՀՀ ԷԲՊ - ի կողմից ստացված տեղեկատվությունը : Այս աղյուսակը արտացոլում է 2006 ից իվեր Թուխմանուկ հանքավայրի արդյունահանման զեկույցն , լրացված Մեգո Գոլդի կողմից :

Table 1






Ստորև աղյուսակում համեմատելով GBGD տվյալները ՀՀ ԷԲՊ - ի կողմից տրամադրված տվյալների հետ, տեսնում ենք այլ պատկեր :

Table 2





Ստորև աղյուսակում  10- Կ զեկույցում GBGD- ի կողմից հրապարակված տվյալներն հաստատելու համար տվյալները համեմատում ենք հայաստանյան տվյալների հետ :

Table 3




2006 թ . GBGD ներկայացրել է 52,000 տ . հանքաքարի արդյունահանում երբ դա փաստացի եղել է 12,100 տ հանքաքար.
 2008 year. GBGD of 82,000 tons. ore when it is actually used to be 45.660 tons. Ore.  
Meanwhile, gold  The volume has been variable . It is to be mentioned in the EBP documents that  in 2006, the ore content index is estimated to be approximately 5.45 g / t, but GBGD - in the Secretariat's report as 1.27 g / t.
Ore 2008 's for , as referred to in the document HHEBP , estimated to be approximately 3.34 g / t , but GBGD - it has its secretariat report as 1.85 g / t specified.

2010 GBGD 21,000 tonnes of ore at 2.08 g / t gold content index, proportionate to  43.68 kg of gold reserves. The official data GBGD - was produced over 16,800 tons. ore 18:31 kg of gold worth, commensurate with 1.17 g / t. Gold production in 2010 in the records of the Secretariat of the Global Gold exaggerate to 24.1 kilograms.

2011 year. GBGD of 21,400 tonnes of ore mined from 0. 92 g / t commensurate with 19.69 kg of gold reserves. The official data GBGD - was produced 11.860 tons. ore 18:31 kg of gold worth, commensurate with 1.54 g / t .: Gold production 201 1 - The Secretariat of the Global Gold records   to exaggerate 1 38 kg.

No investor can not be sure that the actual gold content as the Tughmanuki. The Global Gold for its reporting on the EBP and other content from other content on its financial audit documents submitted to the secretariat. This is a big problem as long as the Global Gold for gold investors in evaluating the assets are based on published data. Global Gold investors were misled by

Արդյոք Գլոբալ Գոլդ կորպորացիացիյում (GBGD), պրն   Վան Զ . Կրկորյանը և պրն Աշոտ Պողոսյանը ամբողջովին և գիտակցաբար դավադրել են 10- Կ աուդիտի ֆինանսական փաստաթղթի կողծ և սուտ գրառումներ թէ իրականում նրանք ՀՀ էներգետիկայի և բնական պաշարների նախարարություն ներկայացրել են սխալ հաշվետվություններ ?  

Simple to , the SEC, PCAOB և ՀՀ ԷԲՊ - ի  կողմից անհրաժեշտ է քննություն իրականացնել իսկության բացահայտման համար :

The translations of words and explanation of the mind  based on the English model.